Uuno Öpik - A great Estonian-UK Scientist |
{Piret Kuusk - Institute of Physics,University of Tartu, Indrek Martinson - Institute of Physics, Lund University, mansucript}
Introduction
Over the years we have written several papers about Estonian physicists who had to leave their country in late 1944 when Soviet Union was occupying Estonia. Estonia was an independent and democratic country between 1918 and 1940. As a result of the secret Molotov-Ribbentrop pact in August 1939, Estonia was included in the Soviet sphere of influence and was occupied by the Soviet Union in June 1940. About 60, 000 Estonians disappeared during the following 13 months. In June 1941 Nazi Germany attacked the Soviet Union, and Estonia was occupied by Germany. This occupation lasted until September 1944. During those three years about 25, 000 Estonians disappeared. As Germany gradually withdrew, the Baltic countries were occupied by the Red Army. In September 1944 about 70,000 Estonians fled their homeland, hoping to settle in democratic countries after the war.
These papers, in Estonian, have appeared in the yearbook of the Estonian Physics Society. In the latest yearbook, issued in February 2005 our article is about three distinguished scientists, Hinrek Neuhaus, Uuno Öpik and Olev Mathiesen. Neuhaus and Mathiesen live in Sweden while Öpik lived in UK. In early 2005 we were in contact with them, by telephone conversations and electronic mails and they received the yearbook in March 2005. In May 2005 we heard that Uuno Öpik had died. He had colleagues and friends in UK and other countries, and we therefore translated the section in our article which describes Uuno’s life and work from Estonian into English. The article was written for general physicists, also including high-school teachers and physics students.
Uuno Öpik
Uuno Öpik was born on October 19, 1926 in Tartu, Estonia. His father was the famous astronomer Ernst Öpik (1893-1985). Uuno graduated from the First high School in Tartu in 1943 and moved with his parents and sister to Germany in the fall of 1944. He told us that : ”The refugees from the Baltic countries who were university professors were well received in Germany and their stay there was well organized. Our family stayed in Danzig, Swinemünde (now Gdansk and Swinouijsie) and in Sielbeck-Uklei (in Schleswig-Holstein). From January 1 1945 till the end of the war I worked in the Hamburg-Bergedorf Observatory and made numerical calculations”. In 1946 he became a student at the Baltic University .(initially in Hamburg and later in Pinneberg) and studied there until the spring of 1948. In the following summer .the Öpik family moved to Northern Ireland and Uuno continued his studies at the Queens’s University of Belfast. He graduated in 1950 with a BSc in mathematics and in 1951 with a BSc in physics. Uuno got his PhD in 1954, at the same university, with the thesis “Quantal investigations of certain excitation and ionization processes”. He worked as a research assistant at the University of Bristol 1955-56, while between 1956 and 1960 he was a lecturer at the University College, Wales. He then returned to the Queen’s University in Belfast, being there a lecturer (1962-68) and reader (1968-1986).However, he. spent the academic year 1965-66. at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory, USA. Uuno Öpik’s field of research was basically theoretical atomic physics. He did not only study atomic structure but also ion-atom collisions. In some remarkable papers he investigated the core polarization effects in atoms and ions [1, 2].
These two papers have been of considerable interest to experimental atomic spectroscopists who frequently study such effects. Öpik also investigated the charge-exchange process in atomic collisions, particularly between a neutral atom and an ion. Here one has to apply the time-dependent Schrödinger equation, which can be complicated, in particular when several electrons are involved Together with H.G. Morrison Uuno developed a new method in which the wavefunction can be developed into a large number of basis functions. The latter are accurately defined in order to describe the movement of one electron between two nuclei [3]. By using this theory it was first possible to describe the collisions between He2+ and H, thereby finding that theory and experiment were in excellent agreement. The authors then extended their formalism to collisions between H+ and H [4], and even for this relatively simple system they significantly improved previous theories. Some years later Morrison and Öpik hade further developed their theory and there now existed a beautiful agreement between theory and elaborate but also very time-consuming and quite difficult experiments [5]. Most of the later work was now carried out by Öpik , because Morrison was working as a high school teacher and later in the Pedagogics department of the university. Thus he had no time to continue the work with the program. Detailed information about this sophisticated program was published in 1993 [6] . In January 2005 Öpik told us that with present-day computers it should not be difficult to obtain truly accurate theoretical results with their programs, but he believed that nobody had tried that.
During the year at the Oak Ridge laboratory Öpik was involved in solid state theory. Together with R.F. Wood he studied the electronic structure and point defects of ionic crystals, for example KCl, KBr, KI and NaCl [7-9]. The authors showed that dielectronic polarization is an important factor which must be included in the theoretical work to reach agreement with experimental data. It is of course well known that the scientists at the Institute of Physics, Tartu University, are performing thorough studies such crystals, primarily by means of experimental techniques, but also theoretically.
Uuno Öpik now lives in Melksham, a small town in southern England, not far from Bristol or Bath He is interested in music, he sings in the local chorus, often attends concerts and plays the piano at home.
Uuno’s son, Lembit Öpik, born in 1965 is a member of the UK Parliament and represents the Liberal Party.
References
1. | H. Eissa, U. Öpik,The polarization of a closed-shell core of an atomic system by an outer electron I. A correction to the adiabatic approximation, Proc. Phys. Soc. 92, 556 (1967). |
2. | U. Öpik, The polarization of a closed-shell core of an atomic system by an outer electrson II Evaluation of the polarizabilities from observed spectra, Proc. Phys. Soc. 92, 566 (1967). |
3. | H.G. Morrison, U. Öpik, An impact-parameter method for heavy-particle collisions involving one electron I. Theory and sample results on H+ - H and H2+ - H . collisions, Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 11, 473 (1978). |
4. | H..G. Morrison, U. Öpik, Excitation and charge transfer to the as and 2p states in H,+ - H collisions in the energy range 49 to 125 keV J. Phys. B; Atom. Molec. Phys. 12. L685 (1979). |
5. | H.G. Morrison, U. Öpik, An impact-parameter method for heavy-particle collisions involving one electron: II. Attempts to improve the accuracy, and results on He2+- H collisions, J. Phys. B: Atom. Molec. Phys. 17, 857 (1984). |
6. | H.G. Morrison, U. Öpik, A program for ion-atom collisions involving one electron, Computer Phys. Commun. 77, 403 (1993). |
7. | R.F. Wood, U. Öpik, Electronic Structure of the U Center. I. Absorption and Lattice Relaxation, Phys. Rev. 162, 736 (1967). |
8. | U. Öpik, R.F. Wood, Point Defects in Ionic Crystals. I. Methods of Calculating the Electronic Structure, Phys. Rev. 179, 772 (1969). |
9. | R.F. Wood, U. Öpik, Point Defects in Ionic Crystals. II. The F Center in KCl. KBr, KI, and NaCl, Phys. Rev. 179, 783 (1969). |
Final remarks
While working with this article we had some telephone conversations with Uuno Öpik and also got several letters from him.
In January 14 he sent some reprints of his papers and told us a little about his father’s scientific career. In the following letter, January 19, . he briefly described his life as a refugee in Germany 1944-48, and answered a question about his collaboration with Dr, H.G. Morrison on charge transfer and excitation (Papers 3-6, above). This information was included in our paper. In his last letter, from February 9, he mentioned that his Ph D thesis adviser had been Sir David Bates while Sir Harrie Massey had been the external examiner. Some weeks later, probably in early April, one of us (IM) had a short telephone conversation with him. It was difficult to hear what he said, except that he liked the article. On May 3 a letter came from his wife Ene Öpik who told us thet Uuno had died on April 30. She added that his disease “Motor Neurone Disease” had developed very rapidly and at the end he could not breathe (The letter was in Estonian). .